Seasonal Conflusion

A new Executive Order with updated vaccine recommendations to the childhood schedule risks creating confusion and access issues for families looking to immunize, threatening protection for communities statewide.

 More

💡 What’s Happening?

On Aug. 10, the White House issued an executive order establishing new “Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations.” Among other changes, the order moves influenza and COVID-19 vaccines for children in a shared clinical decision-making category rather than recommending them universally. It also calls for the separation of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine into three individual vaccines and directs the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to reassess the federal childhood vaccine schedule.

The timing matters. Flu season is approaching, but the federal guidance patients encounter is now in flux. Approved individual vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella don’t exist. The new executive order creates a different framework for how some childhood vaccines have been recommended for years.

For patients and families trying to make informed decisions, changing guidance can create a difficult question: What am I actually supposed to get – and what will it cost me?

🧱 Great Wall of Confusion

Confusion can become an access problem. Federal vaccine recommendations don’t just influence what doctors and patients hear about vaccination – they dictate whether most health plans are required to cover vaccines without cost-sharing. Changes to recommendations can therefore have implications for what patients pay and when coverage requirements take effect.

Another challenge: Individual vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella have been out of stock since 2008, and the latest manufacturer to make them indicated that producing separate vaccines at scale could take years.

The original combination vaccine was designed in part to simplify immunization by reducing the number of injections and visits required. Requiring separate vaccines where a combination product has historically been used could make the process more complicated for families and providers.

Almost all payers are required to cover recommended vaccines at no-cost. This is currently the case for private insurance and employer-sponsored health plans, Medicaid, and Medicare. There is also a mandatory program for Medicaid-eligible and uninsured children – the Vaccines for Children Program – that provides recommended vaccines for free to eligible children (there is no such program for uninsured adults). ….Vaccine coverage requirements are linked to ACIP/CDC recommendations in almost every case. …If ACIP or CDC vaccine recommendations were to be narrowed or removed, as was recently done in the case of COVID-19, most payers would no longer be required to provide no-cost coverage.

KFF: ACIP, CDC, and Insurance Coverage of Vaccines in the United States


It would be time-consuming and expensive to license the shots separately again, Schaffner says. It would also mean more shots for children, more work for doctors, and higher costs for insurance companies. The executive order continues to recommend the MMR vaccine for all children, but talk of splitting the shot could cause confusion among parents, Schaffner says. ‘I can imagine parents going to the pediatrician and asking, ‘Can we do this one at a time? I saw on television that it’s now recommended.’’’”

Time: What Trump’s Executive Order Could Mean for Childhood Vaccines

👥👥️ Choice and Community

When preventive care becomes harder to understand or afford, protecting health through immunization can begin to depend on a family’s ability to pay. If coverage changes leave some physician-recommended vaccines outside of no-cost coverage, only families who can afford to the out-of-pocket costs will be able to follow that recommendation. Others may have to delay or go without – a dilemma 4.9 million uninsured Texans risk facing.

The ability to afford getting vaccinated is more than an individual access problem. It’s a fact that high vaccination rates provide community-level protection by making it harder for contagious diseases to spread. That protection is especially important for children and others who cannot be vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.

The result could be lower vaccination rates, less community protection and greater risk of preventable illnesses across Texas, weighing financially and capacity-wise on a strained health network.

“If vaccinations continue to decline, it could lead to more outbreaks of infectious diseases in Texas and nationwide, Matthews said. Last year’s measles outbreak in West Texas was the state’s largest in more than three decades, resulting in more than 750 cases and the deaths of two young girls. ‘We’re going to see more and more of these outbreaks, and more and more deaths,’ Matthews said. … ‘If we have the opportunity to protect children from harm and to not make them suffer from these diseases that are easily preventable, then we want to take advantage of the full suite of tools that we can.’

Houston Chronicle: What does Trump’s new childhood vaccine order mean for Texas families? Experts are worried.


When a community has a high rate of immunity, it creates a shield of protection for the most vulnerable – the elderly, children, people with chronic medical conditions, infants undeveloped immune systems who are not old enough to receive certain vaccinations, said Dr. Armando Meza, infectious disease specialist at Texas Tech Health El Paso. That’s the advantage of herd immunity, especially for highly transmissible respiratory diseases such as measles, he said. ‘I get my vaccine for not only personal benefit, but I’m protecting other people,’ Meza said. ‘That’s a very important message to be conveyed. If I were to talk to a parent, that would be the approach,’ he said. ‘A decision to look at two perspectives: the individual perspective, which I respect, and the benefit of the community.’

El Paso Matters: Bucking Texas decline in vaccination, El Paso public schools record high immunization rates

🪶 Lighten the Load

When fewer people receive preventive care, the consequences can show up later as an acute medical condition in an emergency department visit or result in a long hospital admission, requiring higher demand for clinical staff and hospital beds and resulting in additional costs for patients, insurers and the health care system as a whole.

Prevention is often the least expensive point in the health care continuum. Once preventable illness becomes serious enough to require hospital care, the price – for everyone – can be much higher.

⭐ As federal vaccine policy evolves, policymakers should consider more than the recommendations themselves – they should also consider what happens when changing guidance creates confusion for patients or makes preventive care harder to afford.

📖 Learn More

Measles Resurgence

The Commonwealth Fund: New Federal Vaccine Recommendations Introduce Ambiguity and Could Lead to Coverage Headaches

American Academy of Pediatrics: Vaccine Confidence Campaign

Header banner with Texas Hospital Association logo on the left and'BEHIND THE HEADLINES' title on the right.